Cases 21 - 30 of 4,454
LESTER v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67538
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. LESTER
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUCKER et al v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. TUCKER and MARY H. TUCKER
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67537
Plaintiff:
FRANK SHACKELFORD WARD
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWEN v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67382
Plaintiff:
FRANK D. OWEN
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARVIN v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67550
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES CARVIN
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAN DYKE et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67650
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. VAN DYKE, JR. and DIANE STRINGER
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. , SOUTHERN TEXTILE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PREGRAM v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67594
Plaintiff:
MARTHA PREGRAM
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67160
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN G. FORE and BARBARA FORE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67168
Plaintiff:
MELVIN F. WILSON
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BABB v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67154
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT BABB
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
