Cases 21 - 27 of 27
NERO v. ST. JOSEPH'S REGIONAL MEDICAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
WILLMYRA NERO
Defendant:
ST. JOSEPH'S REGIONAL MEDICAL HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE AND/OR JANE DOE 1-10 and ABC CORPORATION 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Catania v. Herbst
as 2:2012cv01840
Plaintiff:
Michael Catania
ThirdParty Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe, John Doe and/or Jane Doe and United States Postal Service
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Norma Herbst
Defendant:
Norma Herbst and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
GORDON v. FIRST GROUP PLC et al
as 2:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
LIVINGSTON GORDON
Defendant:
FIRST GROUP PLC , JOHN DOE AND/ OR JANE DOE and ABC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRAN v. DAWN FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00448
Plaintiff:
LE TRAN
Defendant:
DAWN FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. and JOHN DOES, 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20;
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Tomas Carijano, et al v. Occidental Petroleum Corporati, et al
as 08-56270
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TOMAS MAYNAS CARIJANO, JANE DOE 1, a minor, by her guardian JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 2 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and OCCIDENTAL PERUANA, INC., a California Corporation
Tomas Carijano, et al v. Occidental Petroleum Corporati, et al
as 08-56187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMAS MAYNAS CARIJANO, JANE DOE 1, a minor, by her guardian JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3, a minor, by her guardian JANE DOE 4 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and OCCIDENTAL PERUANA, INC., a California Corporation
ORBE v. TARGET DEPARTMENT STORE et al
as 2:2008cv00494
Plaintiff:
MARTHA ORBE
Defendant:
TARGET DEPARTMENT STORE, JOHN DOE AND OR JANE DOE and XYZ CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
