Cases 21 - 30 of 88
LAWSON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55510
Plaintiff:
LEON P. LAWSON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAWSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv05842
Plaintiff:
BRENDA LAWSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAWSON et al v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO.
as 2:2011cv67609
Plaintiff:
ERNEST L. LAWSON and ROSALYN LAWSON
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWSON v. ARMSTRONG WORLD
as 2:2011cv67077
Plaintiff:
GLENMORE K. LAWSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41457
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. LAWSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAWSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36065
Plaintiff:
WILBUR J. LAWSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAWSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36064
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR J. LAWSON, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAWSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64758
Plaintiff:
WADE LAWSON, JR. and EVELYN F LAWSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65455
Plaintiff:
HAROLD E LAWSON and KATHLEEN LAWSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01086
Plaintiff:
VERNON LAWSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION , SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and BURKS & SONS, INC.
Cross_claimant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
BURKS & SONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1348
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
