Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Gumm v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Gumm
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mavar, Jr. v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01813
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Mavar, Jr.
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wanek v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01579
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Wanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McChesney v. United States of America et al
as 8:2013cv00281
Plaintiff:
George R. McChesney
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Customs and Border Protection and Michael P. Langfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cannon et al v. Kirk
as 1:2012cv08556
Plaintiff:
Samuel Cannon and Jessica Cannon
Defendant:
Michael P. Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Abbott et al v. Tonawanda Coke Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Abbott , Anthony Adimey , Dana Allen and others
Defendant:
Tonawanda Coke Corporation , James Donald Crane and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stratton v. Wallace et al
as 1:2011cv00074
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Stratton
Defendant:
Thomas M. Wallace , Millis Transfer, Inc. , Great River Leasing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lennon v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07077
Plaintiff:
Michael p. Lennon
Defendant:
City of New York and OSHA
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Boelsen et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2008cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jason L Boelsen, Jason L Boelsen, Jason L Boelsen and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
