Cases 21 - 30 of 107
POOL v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54965
Plaintiff:
MARK O POOL
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAMM v. NIAGARA POOLS AND SPAS
as 2:2011cv03067
Plaintiff:
KELLY CAMM
Defendant:
NIAGARA POOLS AND SPAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POOLE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC et al
as 2:2011cv62277
Plaintiff:
OSCAR POOLE and JOSEPHINE POOLE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC , CELOTEX CORP , FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POOL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31164
Plaintiff:
MARK O. POOL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
POOLE v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83338
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD POOLE
Defendant:
GAF CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALBERGO et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06400
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH C. ALBERGO , GEORGIA ANDERSON , ALBERT J. BALAZ and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POOLE v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2010cv04810
Plaintiff:
ARTIS R. POOLE
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POOLE v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79543
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA C. POOLE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POOLE v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80533
Plaintiff:
HERMAN POOLE
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POOLE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72230
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. POOLE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
