Cases 21 - 30 of 191
A.V. et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
A.V., IVANA USKOKOVIC and PETER VANDERBERG
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WOLDERGHAI et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
BRIZAFF WOLDERGHAI and KIRO HAGOS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv00725
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and WMATA
Plaintiff:
RAMONIA JONES
MABREY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MABREY and THOMAS A. MABREY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and RANDY CLARKE
MONTGOMERY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
REBECCA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ZUK v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv00294
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and WMATA
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ZUK
HUTCHINSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
ARLENE HUTCHINSON, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM HUTCHINSON and ARLENE HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury
TALLEY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
MISCHON TALLEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
DEL CARMEN CAMPOS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv03691
Plaintiff:
DORA DEL CARMEN CAMPOS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
MCGEE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv03370
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MCGEE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
