Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Sherwood v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 2:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Robert William Sherwood and Pamela Louise Sherwood
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Layton v. Floyd
as 1:2015cv00561
Plaintiff:
William Layton, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles T. Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. Werner Company et al
as 1:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Rose
Defendant:
Werner Company , The Sherwin-Williams Company , Business Entity Does I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Catherine Ferguson and William L Ferguson
Defendant:
General Electric Company and Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Eastern Idaho Railroad, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
William Jed Powell
Defendant:
Eastern Idaho Railroad, L.L.C. and Watco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Riley Creek Lumber Company et al v Mulligan, et al
as 2:2012cv00210
Plaintiff:
Riley Creek Lumber Company and Marc Brinkmeyer
Defendant:
William Mulligan and Shirley Mulligan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marquez v. Sherwin-Williams Company
as 4:2011cv00347
Plaintiff:
Shelia Marquez
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ennis et al v. Arctic Cat, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00178
Plaintiff:
William M. Ennis , Ramona L. Ennis , Darren J. Saum and others
Defendant:
Arctic Cat, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morris et al v. Sudweeks et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
William Morris and Lorna Morris
Defendant:
Jay Sudweeks, Jane Doe Sudweeks, May, Sudweeks & Browning LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Blankenbaker v. Litster et al
as 1:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
Nolan Blankenbaker and Nolan Blankenbaker
Defendant:
William J Litster, Law Offices of William J. Litster PA and Raymond D Schild
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
