Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Baker v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv07712
Plaintiff:
NANCY BAKER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ABBEDUTO et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv05812
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN ABBEDUTO and KEITH ABBEDUTO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knight v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv05796
Plaintiff:
Kim Knight
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Logistics Services, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv05723
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN BENNETT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv05724
Plaintiff:
EDNA BROWN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCHWARTZ v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
WENDY SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEWBILL et al v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 1:2013cv07479
Plaintiff:
DESMOND NEWBILL , SHAWNA BOYCE and MARY BURTON NEWBILL
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO., CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEIS et al v. AIRBORNE HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04238
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GEIS and GREGORY LARUSSO
Defendant:
AIRBORNE HEALTH, INC., WALGREEN, CO. and SHOPRITE SUPER MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
