Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Schneberger v. JA Young & Associates Inc et al
as 5:2010cv01113
Plaintiff:
Aaron Schneberger
Defendant:
JA Young & Associates Inc, TEC Well Services Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schneberger v. JA Young and Associates et al
as 5:2010cv00368
Plaintiff:
Aaron Schneberger
Defendant:
JA Young and Associates, TEC Well Services Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold et al v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
James M Arnold, Kristin J Arnold, Karim Assaf and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, City of Tulsa, Sonoma Grande Tulsa, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Matthews v. Young, Hoychick, & Aguillard, L.L.P. et al
as 4:2007cv00692
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jack Matthews and Douglas Jack Matthews
Defendant:
Young, Hoychick, & Aguillard, L.L.P. and M Terrance Hoychick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Young v. Andritz Inc et al
as 5:2007cv01200
Plaintiff:
Tommy Young
Defendant:
Andritz Inc, Koppers Engineering and Construction International Inc, Sprout Waldron International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Nance et al v. Schneider National Carriers Inc et al
as 5:2007cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jenny Lynn Nance, Jenny Lynn Nance, Lonnie Ray Nance and others
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers Inc, General Insurance Company of America and Robert Jefferson Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Turner et al v. Young et al
as 6:2007cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kim Turner and Sandra Wilson
Defendant:
Cecil Marcus Young and Reliable Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Malone v. Young et al
as 5:2007cv00024
Plaintiff:
Balbina Malone
Defendant:
Sarah Dawn Young and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
