Cases 21 - 30 of 59,654
Irvine v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Heath Irvine
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elswick v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Gary Elswick
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valente v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Joseph Valente
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ellison v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03060
Plaintiff:
Brandi Ellison
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Braden Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gillespie v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Andrea Gillespie
Defendant:
United States of America US Attorney for Northern District of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pittman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Kristi Pittman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stone v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Jason Stone
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamilton et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Betty Gayle Hamilton and James L Hamilton, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Krause v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Jason Krause
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
