Cases 31 - 40 of 217
Jenkins v. Exeter Borough et al
as 3:2015cv01353
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Jenkins, III
Defendant:
Exeter Borough, Oakridge, Ryan Kachinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JENKINS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02250
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER GAIL JENKINS
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMER et al v. JENKINS et al
as 2:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOMER and JANET GOMER
Defendant:
BOYD CADAG JENKINS and ROEHL TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JENKINS v. MORAN FOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05012
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JENKINS
Defendant:
MORAN FOODS, INC. , SUPERVALU, INC. and SAVE-A-LOT, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENKINS v. YOSVANY
as 2:2014cv04318
Plaintiff:
EILEEN JENKINS
Defendant:
GARCIA YOSVANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENKINS-WRIGHT v. HILTON CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03826
Plaintiff:
KHADIJAH JENKINS-WRIGHT
Defendant:
HILTON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORTEZ et al v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2014cv03144
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE , INSPECTOR X , BACCARAT and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
DUDLEY et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05877
Plaintiff:
LINDA DUDLEY , ALESIA DIGGS , DARLENE BRACEY and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEEM et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05854
Plaintiff:
TAUHEEDAH ALEEM , EVELYN ARNETTE-PAYAN , CLARICE BAZILE and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ASHLEY et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05836
Plaintiff:
MARVIN ASHLEY , MANUEL GUTIERREZ , MYRA RUBIN and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
