Cases 31 - 40 of 144
FINKEN v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66589
Plaintiff:
EVERETT FINKEN
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VOGEL v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66577
Plaintiff:
JOE VOGEL
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
S.O.S. PRODUCTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JENSEN v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66604
Plaintiff:
SVEND JENSEN
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MACMARTIN v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66562
Plaintiff:
LD MACMARTIN
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SLAVICK v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66615
Plaintiff:
LAYMAN SLAVICK
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LOEBECK v. A.H. BENNETT COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv66650
Plaintiff:
ALVIN LOEBECK and ALVIN LOEBECK
Defendant:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROLL v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66611
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ROLL
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PASCHKE v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66691
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD PASCHKE
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
THE MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and THE MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FATELEY v. A.H. BENNETT COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv66630
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE FATELEY
Defendant:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LUCIER v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66607
Plaintiff:
RONALD LUCIER
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
