Cases 31 - 40 of 602
Moore et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore and Mary Ann Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Carol Anne Taylor
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Allen L Smith and Mary Ann Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hobbs v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH ANNE HOBBS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yardley v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
ANNE M. YARDLEY
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jordan v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Julie Ann Jordan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Moore v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04341
Plaintiff:
Ann Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sharp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04017
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ann Sharp
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. DePuy International Limited et al
as 1:2022dp20032
Plaintiff:
Carrol Ann Brown
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Helm et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03654
Plaintiff:
Ann Helm and George Helm
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
