Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Calloway v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
Donna Calloway
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cruse et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00605
Plaintiff:
Amber Cruse and Marcus Cruse
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00512
Plaintiff:
Mary Brooks
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00520
Plaintiff:
Cathy Carroll
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allison et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00494
Plaintiff:
Karen Allison and Frank Hutchko
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richelieu et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00462
Plaintiff:
Karen Richelieu and Clinton Richelieu
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien International Finance, SA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00463
Plaintiff:
Dianne Schmidt and Steven Schmidt
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00324
Plaintiff:
Irish Martinez and Theodore Martinez
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien International Finance, SA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
Aleah Harris
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00323
Plaintiff:
Susan Armstrong and David Armstrong
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Covidien Inc., Covidien PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
