Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Todd v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2012cv02239
Defendant:
City of Portland and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Bobby G. Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Huffman v. City of Portland
as 3:2012cv01843
Defendant:
City of Portland
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkes v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2012cv00983
Defendant:
City of Portland Bureau of Police and Detective James Darby
Plaintiff:
Sylena Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. City of Roseburg et al
as 6:2012cv00265
Defendant:
Scott B. Campbell and City of Roseburg
Plaintiff:
Holly Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Thomas v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2011cv01560
Defendant:
City of Portland, D.A. Office, Detective Waddell and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Martin Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Morris et al
as 3:2011cv00865
Plaintiff:
Gayl Anderson and Ronald Anderson
Defendant:
City of Portland and Heather Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Birhanzl v. Fryett et al
as 3:2010cv00755
Plaintiff:
William Birhanzl
Defendant:
City of Oregon City, Greg Fryett, William Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Spesungel v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2010cv00740
Defendant:
Officer Sean Christian, City of Portland, Sargent Larry Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Lukas Spesungel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ferrell v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2008cv06294
Plaintiff:
Brian Willard Ferrell
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Terry Bagley, Scott Vinje and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell v. Boyle et al
as 3:2008cv00727
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Howell
Defendant:
Christopher David Boyle and City of Beaverton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
