Cases 31 - 40 of 80
CASEY v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv59985
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE B. CASEY
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 5:2011cv45729
Plaintiff:
CASEY R. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CASEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST, ET. AL.
as 5:2011cv45576
Plaintiff:
HARRY R. CASEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILTY TRUST, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CASEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42332
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. CASEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CODDINGTON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37691
Plaintiff:
CASEY B. CODDINGTON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CASEY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65178
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR DONALD CASEY and ELEANOR CASEY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw et al v. McMullen
as 3:2011cv00680
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Shaw and Donald Shaw
Defendant:
Casey McMullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASEY v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63791
Plaintiff:
MORRIS CONRAD CASEY and SARAH RUTH RICHARDSON
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RANKIN et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63600
Plaintiff:
EDDIE RANKIN and SHERYL JEAN CASEY RANKIN
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boone v. Polaris Industries, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00412
Plaintiff:
Casey B. Boone
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
