Cases 31 - 38 of 38
BOTTS et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69499
Plaintiff:
JOHN BOTTS and DEBORAH A BOTTS
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, AIRCO INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HENDRICKS et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69359
Plaintiff:
JL HENDRICKS, JL HENDRICKS, FAYE HENDRICKS and others
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, AIRCO, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69357
Plaintiff:
EARL JOHNSON, EARL JOHNSON, JEZELL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, AIRCO, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DUGGER et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69360
Plaintiff:
J.C. DUGGER, J.C. DUGGER, BARBARA JEAN DUGGER and others
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, AIRCO, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DOTSON et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69355
Plaintiff:
CARLENE DOTSON and CARLENE DOTSON
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, AIRCO, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAMSON v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69505
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, AIRCO INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PREWETT v. PREWETT et al
as 2:2009cv69506
Defendant:
GAGE W PREWETT, ABEX CORPORATION, AIRCO INC and others
Plaintiff:
NONA M PREWETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCCRACKEN v. EXXON/MOBIL COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv02932
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
EXXON/MOBIL COMPANY, SUN OIL COMPANY (SUNOCO), SHELL OIL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
