Cases 31 - 40 of 88
SUBER et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv00759
Plaintiff:
JIM SUBER , KATHY ANN MYERS , VELMA ANNE WHITE and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LAWSON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv57865
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR J LAWSON, JR
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARKER et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06386
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. BARKER, SR. , LINDA D. BIGGS , LINELL SMITH BREWINGTON and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAWSON v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2010cv06136
Plaintiff:
MARY A. LAWSON
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56601
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. LAWSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LAWSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv50933
Plaintiff:
JAMES H LAWSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LAWSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75773
Plaintiff:
WILBUR J. LAWSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP.
as 2:2010cv03741
Plaintiff:
LINDA L. LAWSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LAWSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv03619
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAWSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-4 and LESLIE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRIS et al v. KFC U.S. PROPERTIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv03198
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. HARRIS and MARJORIE LAWSON HARRIS
Defendant:
KFC U.S. PROPERTIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
