Cases 31 - 40 of 57
DIEHL v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67888
Plaintiff:
GERALD F DIEHL
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RYAN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67864
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR F. RYAN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TIMM v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67768
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK TIMM
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHY v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67754
Plaintiff:
FLOYD T. SHY
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNAEBE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67881
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVE KNAEBE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHIBLINE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67756
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHIBLINE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANKLAM v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67897
Plaintiff:
CARL F ANKLAM
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINNEMUELLER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67840
Plaintiff:
LAMBERT J WINNEMUELLER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHINDLER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67753
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JH SCHINDLER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAYDEN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67834
Plaintiff:
JOHN W HAYDEN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
