Cases 31 - 40 of 61
McDonald et al v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 1:2016cv00327
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Hilton Waikoloa Village
Plaintiff:
Pamela K McDonald and Daniel W McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Durrani, M.D. et al
as 1:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Kevin McDonald
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani, M.D. , Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and Center For Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conrad et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv03127
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad and Tammy Conrad
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and Mac-Sto Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan v. McDonald
as 1:2015cv02384
Plaintiff:
Annette Ryan
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Agee et al v. Alphatec Spine, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00750
Defendant:
Alphatec Spine, Inc. and Parcell Laboratories, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michelle Agee , Gayle Bachman , Nick Battista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDonald v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02342
Plaintiff:
Daphne J. McDonald
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv00865
Plaintiff:
Marjorie L. Crawford
Defendant:
United States of America and Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
McDonald v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01570
Plaintiff:
Paula Ann McDonald
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01152
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. McDonald
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00664
Plaintiff:
Lynda M. McDonald
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
