Cases 31 - 40 of 65
RICKS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65301
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LASALLE RICKS and ESTHER T RICKS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICKS et al v. A. C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60942
Plaintiff:
MARCUS R. RICKS and NELLA A. RICKS
Defendant:
A. C. & S., INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICKS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61158
Plaintiff:
ESCHOL RICKS and IRENE RICKS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC. , GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONTELEONE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv07546
Plaintiff:
RICK MONTELEONE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ODEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57630
Plaintiff:
RICK A. ODEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MARTUCCI v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54192
Plaintiff:
RICK MARTUCCI
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CAVENDER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53717
Plaintiff:
RICK D. CAVENDER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MAYO v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41605
Plaintiff:
RICK A. MAYO
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RICKS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39066
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE L. RICKS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CAVENDER v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31576
Plaintiff:
RICK D. CAVENDER
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
