Torts - Injury Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 36 of 36
ROACH v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72471
Plaintiff: PRINCE ROACH
Defendant: ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
MCCANN et al v. MILLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00561
Plaintiff: FRANK MCCANN and EILEEN MCCANN
Defendant: STEVE MILLER, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, THOMAS BUFFENBARGER and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROACH et al v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD et al
as 2:2007cv70776
Plaintiff: ESKER L ROACH and RACHEL E ROACH
Defendant: ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD, CAREY CANADA CORPORATION, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROACH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP et al
as 2:2007cv69209
Plaintiff: ROY G ROACH and ALICE E. ROACH
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP and OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING CO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROACH et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. N/K/A RHONE POULENC, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66663
Plaintiff: JAMES GILBERT ROACH and CAROL ROACH
Defendant: AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. N/K/A RHONE POULENC, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROACH et al v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv61499
Plaintiff: RICHARD STEVEN ROACH and PATRICIA ANN ROACH
Defendant: ACANDS INCORPORATED, AQUA-CHEM INC, AQUA-CHEM INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?