Torts - Injury Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 31 - 40 of 372
Redman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00729
Plaintiff: Paul Redman, Sr.
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goff v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Whitaker et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff: Darrell Whitaker, Sr. and Elizabeth Whitaker
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chamberlin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04211
Plaintiff: Anthony Chamberlin, Sr.
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04147
Plaintiff: William B. Hill, Sr.
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garza, Sr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04036
Plaintiff: Brian Garza, Sr.
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hairston v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03996
Plaintiff: Mr. Rickey Hairston and Rickey Hairston, Sr.
Defendant: CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelms v. Madison et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03663
Plaintiff: Tony L. Nelms, Sr.
Defendant: Director James Madison, Luci, Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller, Sr. v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03232
Plaintiff: Phillip Miller, Sr.
Defendant: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03488
Plaintiff: Richard Carter, Sr.
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?