Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Stone et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00616
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Stone and Patricia Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01469
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karen Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goss et al v. Stone et al
as 3:2018cv01901
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and John E. Stone
Plaintiff:
Adrienne C. Goss and Lester Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45920
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sheriff Mike Stone and Mike Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelsey et al v. Grabinski et al
as 3:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Sean Kelsey , Frances Kelsey , Mary Kelsey and others
Defendant:
Leszek Grabinski, Roger Stone, Grzegorz Budnik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Long et al v. Top Line Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00589
Plaintiff:
Robert Long and Cathy Long
Defendant:
Top Line Express, Inc. , Leszek Grabinski , Roger Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clouser v. Top Line Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01795
Plaintiff:
Andrew B. Clouser
Defendant:
Top Line Express, Inc., Leszek Grabinski, Roger Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolfe v. Albrecht et al
as 2:2015cv02773
Defendant:
Richard Albrecht, Quintina L. Stone, Sunrise Express, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01896
Plaintiff:
Justin Ray Stone
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Mark Stone
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
