Cases 41 - 50 of 58
May Ship Contracting Corporation v. Temptress Temptesta, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv05629
Defendant:
Marco Polo Cruises, LLC, Temptress No. 2658511 and Temptress Temptesta, LLC
Plaintiff:
May Ship Contracting Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Bagwell et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2015cv07412
Plaintiff:
Jacqulyn Marie Atkins , Zachary Bagwell , Allan Barry and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garman v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 7:2014cv08421
Plaintiff:
Melissa May Garman
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mays v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv05889
Plaintiff:
April Mays
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erica Baker et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2014cv02731
Plaintiff:
Erica Baker , Sara Barker , Christina Bell and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Doris M. May
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Porter v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04595
Plaintiff:
Lilly May Porter
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Sancho v. Dudek et al
as 1:2012cv01742
Defendant:
Wojciech A. Dudek and James C. May
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Sancho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jaghama v. May et al
as 1:2011cv05826
Plaintiff:
Omaran Jaghama
Defendant:
Jonathan B. May and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Davis v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2011cv00021
Plaintiff:
May E. Davis
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
