Cases 41 - 50 of 28,956
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67788
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. JONES
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOVAC et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2011cv67794
Defendant:
ATLAS TURNER, INC., EMPIRE ACE INSULATION MANUFACTURING CO., MONSANTOS CHEMICAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARBIN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67790
Plaintiff:
HUGH RAY HARBIN
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDANIEL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67787
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM McDANIEL
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67785
Plaintiff:
VENISE FAYE JONES
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACKWELL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67789
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ETHERDIGE v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67791
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY H. ETHERDIGE
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67786
Plaintiff:
JOE L. ALLEN
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUTOR v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67773
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND H TUTOR
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARKE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67768
Plaintiff:
LYNDON D CLARKE and MARTHA L CLARKE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
