Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Vlasvich et al v. Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07817
Plaintiff:
Kelly Vlasvich and Chris Vlasvich
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nido v. Zelaya et al
as 1:2013cv05698
Defendant:
John C. Zelaya
Plaintiff:
Luis Nido
Garnishee:
Chris D. Jackman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Richardson v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02173
Plaintiff:
Erika Richardson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Chris Hundley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gomez v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2013cv51082
Plaintiff:
Chris Gomez
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tompkins v. Kennelly et al
as 1:2013cv02515
Plaintiff:
Wavery D. Tompkins
Defendant:
Matthew F. Kennelly, Neil Toppel, Margaret M Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holly v. QLink, L.P. et al
as 3:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
Chris Holly
Defendant:
QLink, L.P. and Zhejiang Cfmoto Power Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rennick v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04940
Plaintiff:
Chris Rennick
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Pioneer Railcorp et al
as 1:2011cv01400
Plaintiff:
Chris Johnson
Defendant:
Pioneer Railcorp and Decatur Junction Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Hogan v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv00961
Plaintiff:
Marissa Hogan
Defendant:
Chris L Smith and City of Cairo IL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Marder et al
as 1:2011cv04136
Plaintiff:
Mary L Williams
Defendant:
Chris Marder , William Weinsheimer, Michael Cottle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
