Cases 41 - 50 of 28,086
Tidmore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Robert Tidmore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sayers v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Ricky Sayers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C R Bard Inc, Becton Dickinson and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hastie et al v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Allyn Hastie and Thomas Hastie
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoskins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03030
Plaintiff:
Pamela K Hoskins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thompson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
David Thompson and Tina Thompson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zwiefelhofer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Neal Zwiefelhofer
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gillmore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03031
Plaintiff:
Debra Gillmore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nobles v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02935
Plaintiff:
Chablis M Nobles
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rodriguez Diaz v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02919
Plaintiff:
Jose Anibal Rodriguez Diaz
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02923
Plaintiff:
Dylan M Clark
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
