Cases 41 - 50 of 160
Dowd et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2023cv02948
Plaintiff:
Israel R. Dowd and Kandis G. Dowd
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sarter et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02308
Plaintiff:
Clorie Sarter and Richard Wilbert
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Judge v. General Motors LLC
as 5:2023cv06710
Plaintiff:
Rupinder Judge
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Sung et al v. General Motors LLC
as 5:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth T. Sung and Woosung Lee
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Kaakejian v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Harout Kaakejian
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Aram Balian v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10446
Plaintiff:
Adam Balian
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Thomas v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2023cv06364
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Thomas
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Mulders v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2023cv06395
Plaintiff:
Marc Anthony Mulders
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Chen v. General Motors LLC
as 5:2023cv06509
Plaintiff:
Yung Kan Chen
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Rosero v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02356
Plaintiff:
Raffy Rosero
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
