Cases 41 - 50 of 3,103
MACHINGO v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86041
Plaintiff:
MARGARET MACHINGO
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DAVIS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86554
Plaintiff:
JERRY CLARENCE DAVIS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
THOMAS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86108
Plaintiff:
CLYDE THOMAS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
schoenecker v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86073
Plaintiff:
edmund SCHOENECKER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MORTENSON v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86123
Plaintiff:
MAYLEN MORTENSON
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FROST, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86565
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HENRY FROST
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ADAMS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86523
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KENNETH ADAMS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RILEY, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86587
Plaintiff:
JAMES FULTON RILEY
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
REED v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86070
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. REED
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BEENE v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86077
Plaintiff:
DAVID RANDALL
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
