Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Romero v. Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C et al
as 6:2018cv01459
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A Romero
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams, et al v. Nationwide General Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2018cv06791
Undetermined:
Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pierre, Marlick Williams, Jasmine Williams and others
Defendant:
Shirley Austin, Nationwide General Insurance Company and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. C V S Pharmacy Inc
as 6:2017cv01601
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Davis and Jessie Hammons Davis
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sieber et al v. Delta Air Lines, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv13024
Defendant:
Katherine Weems, Jane Doe, Jesse Steer and others
Plaintiff:
Johannes Markus Sieber and Mina Margareta Sieber Schneiter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doucet v. Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC
as 6:2017cv00538
Plaintiff:
Flaudry Doucet
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Dillard University
as 2:2017cv02645
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Dillard University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Lewis v. Doe et al
as 2:2016cv14915
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickens v. Target Corporation of Minnesota
as 3:2016cv00215
Plaintiff:
Karen Dickens
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rayford et al v. Karl Storz Endoscopy-America et al
as 3:2015cv02835
Plaintiff:
Audrey Rayford and Darryl Rayford
Defendant:
Karl Storz Endoscopy America Inc, Karl Storz Endovision Inc, Karl Storz G M B H & Co K G and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2015cv02637
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Neville, Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
LeGee Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
