Cases 41 - 50 of 337
ALLEN v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45884
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. ALLEN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL, UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GRAY v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45887
Plaintiff:
WALTER W. GRAY
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL, UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JENKINS v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO., INC.
as 2:2011cv35528
Plaintiff:
ERNEST JENKINS
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRULEY v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv38259
Plaintiff:
LEROY G DRULEY
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BORLAND v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv37108
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. BORLAND
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MCPHERSON v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv39601
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH M MCPHERSON
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HENRY et al v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC. et al
as 2:2011cv35236
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BERKINS v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv36962
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR L BERKINS
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FAZIO v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO., INC.
as 2:2011cv38483
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. FAZIO
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FINCH et al v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
as 2:2011cv34450
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FINCH , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
