Cases 41 - 48 of 48
COHEN et al v. MCCALL
as 2:2009cv00558
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COHEN and EVE COHEN
Defendant:
CHARLES MCCALL, III
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCCALL
as 2:2009cv60098
Plaintiff:
JAMES V MCCALL and LINDA H MCCALL
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCCALL v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2009cv60097
Plaintiff:
JAMES V MCCALL and LINDA H MCCALL
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCCALL v. A.M. LOCKETT & CO., ET AL.
as 2:2008cv77078
Plaintiff:
BRENDA L. MCCALL and BRENDA L. MCCALL
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCCALL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68565
Plaintiff:
DANIEL P. MCCALL
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ARMSTRONG et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66298
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. ARMSTRONG, JANETTA ARMSTRONG, TROY GERALD BENTLEY and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP., CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCCALL et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2007cv63776
Plaintiff:
DENNIS HAYDEN MCCALL and GWENDOLYN M MCCALL
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GIBSON et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2007cv61412
Plaintiff:
JAMES W GIBSON, JAMES W GIBSON, MARGARET L GIBSON and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
