Cases 41 - 50 of 293
Stephens v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01836
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stephens
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc., John Doe Sales Representatives 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01487
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
House v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. House
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wareham et al v. Dolgen Midwest, LLC
as 1:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Mary Wareham and Stephen Wareham
Defendant:
Dolgen Midwest, LLC doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shaffer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Stephen Shaffer
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephens v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Antanice Stephens
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burrell v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Stephen Burrell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blankenship v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Stephen Blankenship
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Metten et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04535
Plaintiff:
Stephen Metten and Elaine Metten
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hacker v. Gibbs
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hacker
Defendant:
Tyler Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
