Cases 41 - 47 of 47
SWIFT et al v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2008cv90967
Plaintiff:
P JOHN SWIFT and JOANN SWIFT
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SWIFT v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86107
Plaintiff:
SHELDON SWIFT
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WERLEY et al v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY et al
as 5:2008cv02046
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY WERLEY and CHRISTY WERLEY
Defendant:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY and CORLEY WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Frisof v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02331
Plaintiff:
Marie Frisof
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co., Inc., Swift Transportation Corporation, Swift Leasing Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Burnett v. Swift Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01490
Plaintiff:
Terry Burnett
Defendant:
Swift Transportation, Inc., Sparks Finance Company, Inc., John E. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BURNETT v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02745
Plaintiff:
TERRY BURNETT
Defendant:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION, INC., SPARKS FINANCE COMPANY, INC., JOHN E JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vargo, et al v. Mangus, et al
as 3:2001cv00001
Plaintiff:
David Vargo and Lori Vargo
Defendant:
Sharon Mangus and Swift Transportation Corporation
Third_party_plaintiff:
Sharon Mangus and Swift Transportation Corporation
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Thomas Thomas Morrell d/b/a Morell's Auto Service and Morell's Auto Service
Counterclaim_defendant:
Sharon Mangus , Swift Transportation Corporation , David Vargo and others
Miscellaneous_party:
Peachtree Settlement Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
