Cases 41 - 50 of 664
WIGGINS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02807
Plaintiff:
GARY WIGGINS and CARMEN WIGGINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOES I-III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02741
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RENEE MARIE BUMB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
PEREZ v. E.R. DUNPHEY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02564
Plaintiff:
MARY PEREZ
Defendant:
E.R. DUNPHEY, INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
RICHARDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02433
Plaintiff:
MARIA RICHARDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
GONZALO-FLORES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
GERMAN GONZALO-FLORES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
OJO v. TIGGS et al.
as 2:2023cv02434
Plaintiff:
OMOLAYE P OJO
Defendant:
JOSHUA L TIGGS, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
GRAHAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02395
Plaintiff:
Stephany Graham
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
KURTZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02333
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL KURTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
RAMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02217
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RAMOS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
v. Glasso et al
as 1:2023cv02164
Defendant:
Valentino Glasso, Rosemary Glasso and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
