Cases 41 - 50 of 61
CORTEZ v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2011cv03362
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Defendant:
KATHLEEN EDWARDS, HORACIO VASQUEZ and JODI FRONEFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv33940
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL VASQUEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VASQUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30800
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL VASQUEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VASQUEZ v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06214
Plaintiff:
GENE V. VASQUEZ
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VASQUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56237
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO VASQUEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
VASQUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52661
Plaintiff:
LOUIS G. VASQUEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
VASQUEZ v. ISCO, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80921
Plaintiff:
PETE VASQUEZ
Defendant:
ISCO, INC. , SEALAND SERV. INC. , WESTCHESTER MARINE SHIPPING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79381
Plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and CARLOS VASQUEZ
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAZQUEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71196
Plaintiff:
JUAN E VASQUEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71190
Plaintiff:
LOUIS G. VASQUEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
