Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Tinnell v. Allen
as 3:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
Daniel H Tinnell
Defendant:
Howard E Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rowe et al v. Ellis et al
as 7:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Danielle Rowe and H. R.
Defendant:
David H. Ellis and Geico General Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Geico General Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
David H. Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aaron et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jim W. Aaron, Jr. , Jimmie D. Adams , Teena Adams and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company , AAIPharma, Inc., AAIPharma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeVine et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv00327
Plaintiff:
Geneva DeVine , James H. DeVine , Patrick Garrett and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, AAIPharma, Inc., AAIPharma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hastings v. Allen
as 5:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
Hilton H. Hastings
Defendant:
John R Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dierig v. Lees Leisure Ind Ltd et al
as 2:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Dierig
Defendant:
Lees Leisure Ind Ltd, Lite Tent Camper, LLC and Jimmie G. Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. Harrell
as 3:2011cv00302
Plaintiff:
Thereasa S. Daniel
Defendant:
Brigatta H. Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kessler et al v. Kiesser et al
as 1:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tracy H. Kessler and Amanda R. Kessler
Defendant:
Rex A. Kiesser and Interstate Distributor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Haws Memorial Nursing & Rehabilitation Center et al
as 5:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
James Adams
Defendant:
Aubrey B. Preston, Jennifer H. Connell and Fulton Investors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierson v. Worthington et al
as 3:2010cv00750
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Pierson
Defendant:
Rex H. Worthington and North Star Ranch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
