Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Bryant v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc et al
as 1:2012dp22726
Plaintiff:
Robert L Bryant
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv01621
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Bryant
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21415
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Bryant
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011dp22115
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Bryant
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21683
Plaintiff:
Phil L. Bryant and Shirley Bryant
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DuPuy, Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 1:2011dp21681
Plaintiff:
Phil L. Bryant and Shirley Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21458
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Donna Miller
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Shawna Bagley, James Lipscomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bryant et al v. GMAC Insurance
as 5:2010cv01501
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Bryant and Linda B. Bryant
Defendant:
GMAC Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2007oe40606
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Bryant
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
