Cases 51 - 60 of 24,100
Hampton, Sr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03392
Plaintiff:
George Hampton, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gardner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03391
Plaintiff:
Warren Gardner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yancheski et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03416
Plaintiff:
Keith Yancheski and Sandra Yancheski
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kessler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03403
Plaintiff:
Charles Kessler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamlett v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03400
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hamlett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maguire et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03401
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maguire and Nannette Maguire
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reinert v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03402
Plaintiff:
John Reinert
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03381
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Edwards
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santiago v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03382
Plaintiff:
Eddie Santiago
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Polanczyk v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03386
Plaintiff:
Henry Polanczyk
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
