Cases 51 - 60 of 24,043
Weathersby v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03323
Plaintiff:
Madinah Weathersby
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gallegos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gallegos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03262
Plaintiff:
Earl Noland
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03263
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03275
Plaintiff:
Edwin Hall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leventman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03271
Plaintiff:
Kathleen W Leventman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Redmon et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03274
Plaintiff:
Robert Redmon and Alanna Shelton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Griffis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03296
Plaintiff:
Shawn Griffis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Criswell et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03266
Plaintiff:
Francene Criswell and Randy Criswell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fioravanti v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04285
Plaintiff:
Patricia Fioravanti
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
