Cases 51 - 60 of 80
McKinley v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00903
Plaintiff:
Robert McKinley, Jr.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atlas Foundry Company, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McKinley v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00903
Plaintiff:
Robert McKinley, Jr.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atlas Foundry Company, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ronald Seguine et al v. Ajax Boiler Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10316
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps Inc:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Ajax Boiler Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Burnham LLC and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chief Auto Part:
Autozone West Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Borg-Warner Corporation:
Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Kragen Auto Supply Co:
CSK Auto Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Cochrane Corporation:
Crane Environmental Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company:
Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Cutler-Hammer Inc:
Eaton Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu:
FMC Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Bendix Corporation:
Honeywell International Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor In Interest To DelavalTurbine Inc:
IMO Industries Inc
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To York International:
Johnson Controls Inc
Individually And As Successor In Interest To Kewanee Boiler Corporation:
Oakfabco Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Abex Corporation:
Pneumo Abex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Seguine and Ronald Seguine
As Successor-in-interest To Titusville Forge Company:
Struthers Wells Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries Inc And Successor To Erie City Iron Wor:
Zurn Industries LLC
Deason et al v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
as 3:2011cv05667
Plaintiff:
James Deason and Mary Deason
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company , A.W. Chesterton Company , Astra Flooring Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paul N Kanonas v. Amcord Inc et al
as 2:2011cv09707
Defendant:
Amcord Inc, Buffalo Pumps Inc, CBS Corporation and others
Individually And As Successor In Interest To Delaval Steam Turbine Inc:
IMO Industries Inc
Dba JM Pipe Manufacturing Company:
JM Manufacturing Company Inc
Plaintiff:
Paul N Kanonas
Fka LA Rubber Company:
Mechanical Drives and Belting
Individually And As Successor In Interest To Owens Illinois Glass Company And Dba O-I:
Owens-Illinois Inc
Bond et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2011cv04199
Plaintiff:
Marisa Bond and Allen Pagan
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb, Inc., Gould, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al
as 4:2011cv03618
Plaintiff:
James E. Owens
Defendant:
Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, Thomas Dee Engineering Co. Inc., Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King et al v. A.O.Smith Corp. et al
as 3:2010cv04921
Plaintiff:
Hazel King , Lori King , Teri Parslow and others
Defendant:
A.O.Smith Corp., A.W. Chesterton Company, Advocate Mines, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ricco v. Advance Mechanical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv04713
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC, Trane US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Ricco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fischer et al v. Asbestos Companies et al
as 4:2010cv04476
Plaintiff:
Frances Joseph Fischer and Kay Fischer
Defendant:
Asbestos Companies, A.W. Chesterton Company, American Standard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
