Cases 51 - 60 of 140
Alcinord v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2014cv01569
Plaintiff:
Nickenson Alcinord
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robenson v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2014cv01570
Plaintiff:
Bien Aime Robenson
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michel v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2014cv01530
Plaintiff:
Bernard Michel
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francois v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2014cv01436
Plaintiff:
Herby Francois
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cameus v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2014cv00815
Plaintiff:
Mickenson Cameus
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deriza v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2014cv00668
Plaintiff:
Jason Maxwel Deriza
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chamberlin v. PSI Upsilon Fraternity, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00308
Plaintiff:
Cabri Chamberlin
Defendant:
PSI Upsilon Fraternity, Inc. , XI Chapter of PSI Upsilon Fraternity , Kwame Chihombori-Quao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mackenson v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jacques Mackenson
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vasconcelos et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Francesca Vasconcelos and Rui Vasconcelos
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology , Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Marchand et al
as 3:2013cv01910
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Mary Marchand, Robert Murphy and Jeanine Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
