Cases 51 - 60 of 19,048
ABUSALMAN et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02211
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE ABUSALMAN and ADAM SALMAN
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC and J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D.B. et al v. PFIZER INC et al
as 2:2016cv01438
Plaintiff:
D.B. and JULIE PARMLEY
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PFIZER INTERNATIONAL INC., LLC , J.B. ROERIG & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOLIDAY v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
MELISSA SOLIDAY
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AVERY v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06292
Plaintiff:
KELLI AVERY
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and GREENSTONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAY et al v. PFIZER INC.,
as 2:2015cv05998
Plaintiff:
SHERI RAY and REBECCA RAY
Defendant:
PFIZER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTHEWS v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05905
Plaintiff:
LATOYA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRUETT v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05861
Plaintiff:
GINA PRUETT
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and FOREST LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PHILLIPS v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04895
Plaintiff:
CHERYL PHILLIPS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC and J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUFF et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04196
Plaintiff:
APRIL HUFF and K.L.
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. and GREENSTONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIN et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04065
Plaintiff:
JOANNY NIN and A.G.
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. , FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and FOREST LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
