Cases 51 - 60 of 172
WOLK v. OVERLAWYERED.COM et al
as 2:2011cv04900
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR ALAN WOLK
Defendant:
OVERLAWYERED.COM, THE OVERLAWYERED GROUP, WALTER K. OLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44389
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SULLIVAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, et al
as 2:2011cv42443
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. SULLIVAN , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SULLIVAN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv34154
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SULLIVAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv34153
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Sullivan v. Ruby Tuesday
as 1:2011cv01146
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Sullivan
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sones et al v. Smay et al
as 4:2011cv01073
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Sones and Laura Ann Sones
Defendant:
John Andrew Smay, The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Court of Common Pleas 44th District Sullivan County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OLIVO v. NASH CONTRACTING, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03543
Plaintiff:
FRANCES OLIVO
Defendant:
NASH CONTRACTING, INC. and JON M. SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEBARRON v. CANADIAN DREDGE & DOCK et al
as 2:2011cv33764
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. LEBARRON
Defendant:
CANADIAN DREDGE & DOCK, LACROSSE DREDGING CO., MERRITT CHAPMAN SCOTT and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN et al v. DUNBAR & SULLIVAN DREDGING COMPANY
as 2:2011cv33711
Plaintiff:
VINCENT J COLEMAN , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
DUNBAR & SULLIVAN DREDGING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
