Cases 61 - 67 of 67
PEACOCK et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv65931
Plaintiff:
HOWARD PRICE PEACOCK and VICKIE CONNER PEACOCK
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant:
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION, GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ALLEN et al v. A.C.AND S.INC.,ET AL
as 2:2007cv66349
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA A. ALLEN, MARCELLOUS BARNEY, WINIFRED N. BATTS and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CONNER et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66521
Plaintiff:
R. L. CONNER and EARLENE CONNER
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CONNER v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv65721
Plaintiff:
HUBERT R. CONNER
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GEORGE et al v. CONNER et al
as 2:2007cv01036
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE GEORGE and EDWARD GEORGE
Defendant:
GEORGE B. CONNER, III and EDMUND B, CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CONNER et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv60999
Plaintiff:
ABBOTT E. CONNER and SUE H. CONNER
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CONNER v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP et al
as 2:2007cv60516
Plaintiff:
PEGGY CONNER
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP, PITTSBURG CORNING CORPORATION, Acands Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
