Cases 61 - 70 of 6,410
BURKE et al v. OWENS ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv83716
Plaintiff:
EDMUND D. BURKE, JR. and MARY BURKE
Defendant:
OWENS ILLINOIS, INC. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv83318
Plaintiff:
PATRICK D. BURKE and ELISSA BURKE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION , EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKE et al v. OWENS-ILLINOIS INC. et al
as 2:2010cv83577
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BURKE and PATRICIA BURKE
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS INC. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. , EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AJELLO et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06395
Plaintiff:
GEORGE D. AJELLO , BURT BADGER , EDWINA BASTIEN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURKE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57194
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BURKE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BURKE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57609
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. BURKE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BURKE et al v. AMERICAN MAIL LINES
as 2:2010cv57534
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BURKE and CREIGTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN MAIL LINES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BURKE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2010cv54048
Plaintiff:
LEE R. BURKE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BURKE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
as 2:2010cv51978
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BURKE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BURKE et al
as 2:2010cv51093
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY L BURKE and A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
