Cases 61 - 70 of 279
COLEMAN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37761
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD A COLEMAN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37766
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COLEMAN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37765
Plaintiff:
LEANDER COLEMAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37764
Plaintiff:
DEWEY C COLEMAN, JR and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37763
Plaintiff:
ETHEL E COLEMAN and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64851
Plaintiff:
CLARKS B. COLEMAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLEMAN et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv33712
Plaintiff:
VINCENT J COLEMAN , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN et al v. DUNBAR & SULLIVAN DREDGING COMPANY
as 2:2011cv33711
Plaintiff:
VINCENT J COLEMAN , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
DUNBAR & SULLIVAN DREDGING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv33710
Plaintiff:
VINCENT J COLEMAN , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63798
Plaintiff:
ALBERT COLEMAN, JR.
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
