Cases 61 - 70 of 91
SHORT v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69082
Plaintiff:
KELLY SHORT
Defendant:
A C & S INC , CSR LTD , CHICAGO FIREBRICK CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICELY v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69077
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY THE , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA K. NICELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAGAT v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67596
Plaintiff:
FRANK J SAGAT
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CZARNIK v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67595
Plaintiff:
IRENE HELEN CZARNIK
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LITTON v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67606
Plaintiff:
PAUL A LITTON
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , CSR LTD , CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOCH et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv67540
Plaintiff:
LOUISE B. KOCH and WILLIAM E. KOCH
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORDBERG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67537
Plaintiff:
HOWARD R NORDBERG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , CROWN, CORK & SEAL, INC., DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFMAN v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2010cv64568
Plaintiff:
DONALD L COFFMAN
Defendant:
AC&S INC , CSR LTD, CROWN CORK & SEAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHIPMAN v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2010cv64555
Plaintiff:
LARRY SHIPMAN
Defendant:
AC&S INC , CSR LTD, CROWN CORK & SEAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HETHERINGTON v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2010cv64556
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. HETHERINGTON
Defendant:
AC&S INC , CSR LTD, CROWN CORK & SEAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
