Cases 61 - 70 of 111
Gallivan v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv00826
Plaintiff:
Dane Gallivan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Creahan v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
James Creahan
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gelfarb v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv04406
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Eda Gelfarb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Zendell v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03430
Plaintiff:
Robin Zendell
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. and Ethicon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Sweeney v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
Shawn Sweeney
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01377
Plaintiff:
Cherri L. Clark and Jon L. Clark
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carpenter v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07106
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc., Ethicon US LLC, Ethicon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hingos v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00969
Plaintiff:
Hailey Hingos
Defendant:
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. , Boston Scientific Corporation , Meadox Medicals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arama v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
Israel Arama
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Ethicon, Inc.,, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Peterson et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 1:2015cv07356
Defendant:
ABC Corporations, Axtrocare GmbH, Blue Endo and others
Plaintiff:
Ben Peterson, Jr. and Mirriam A. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
